Notifications/ Orders

Pending High Court Cases

Sl# Case No. Title of the case Nature of case Stage of the case Type of cases
1. CWP No. 457/98 Savitri Lal Reg. Construction not to be allowed around Himrus building circular road Shimla Reply filed on 11.8.1998. Case under Act and Rules
2. O.A. No. 1409/98 Madan Lal V/s State Regarding Re-engagement as Chainman Reply filed on 27-3-1999 Service matter
3. R.S.A No. 112/98 Smt. Krishna Devi V/s State Appeal against order dated 1-10-1997 passed by the ld. District Judge Shimla Intimated T.C.P. Shimla vide letter dated 10-3-2010. Case under Act and Rules
4. CWP 555/99 Sh. K.N. Kashyap Vs. State of H.P. Regarding Planning Permission case in Boileougang, Chakkar Shimla. Reply filed on 3-2-2000. Case under Act and Rules
5. RSA 114/2000 Sh. Mohinder Kumar Vs. Padam Reg. Encroachment Informed A.G. vide letter dated 17-1-2000. Case under Act and Rules
6. CWP 654/2000 Smt. Surekha Vs. State of H.P. Regarding Planning Permission Reply filed on 25.10.2000. Case under Act and Rules
7. CWP 907/2000 Sh. Nika Ram Vs. State of H.P. Regarding Planning Permission Reply filed on 28.2.2001 Case under Act and Rules
8. CWP 1291/01 Sh. Jag Jiwan Ram V/s State of H.P. Reg. Planning Permission case As area falls in M.C. Shimla and record transferred to M.C. Shimla therefore A.G. intimated vide letter dated 8.10.2002. Case under Act and Rules
9. C.R. 110/01 Smt. Piaro Devi V/s State of H.P. Reg. NOC for electricity connection Reply filed on 8-1-2002. Case under Act and Rules
10. Civil Revision No. 68/01 Arun Kumar V/s Prittam Chand Restraining construction of house in Sanjauli by Defendant and orders passed by District Judge, Shimla dated 1.11.2000 assailed A.G. requested to defend Respondent No. 3 Case under Act and Rules
11. CWP 1299/01 Y.V. Mehra V/s State Illegal Construction in Dalhousie As desired the comments on representation of Y.V. Mehra sent to A.G. vide letter dated 25-9-04. Case under Act and Rules
12. CWP 998/01 Sh. Narain Singh V/s State of H.P. Core Area case. Reply filed on 18.12.02. Case under Act and Rules
13. CWP No. 110/2001 State Vs Pairo Devi Unauthorized Construction Reply filed Case under Act & Rules
14. Regular First Appeal 231/01 Mrs. Rani Padam Jeet Singh V/s State of H.P. Core Area Case A.G. requested vide letter dated 22.11.01 to defend the Department . Case under Act and Rules
15. Civil Revision 460/02 Sh. Amrik Singh V/s Balak Ram. Appeal against the orders of District Judge Shimla dated 18.9.02 whereby orders of Court below partially modified. A.G. requested vide letter 24.2.2003 to Defend the Director, Town and Country Planning Department as Performa respondent No.2. Case under Act and Rules
16. CWP 1135/02 Sh. Surat Ram V/s Firm Seith and Company Suit for recovery dispute is between private parties. Reply filed on 10-4-03. Case under Act and Rules
17. CWP 956/03 Smt. Trisha Sharma V/s State Heritage Zone case Personal Compliance affidavit regarding fixing of plaques on the heritage buildings stands filed . Case under Act and Rules
18. CWP 1056/03 Sh. Amar Jeet Singh V/s State Retention Policy Reply filed on 12.2.04. Case under Act and Rules
19. C.S. 5/03 Sh. Surat Ram V/s State Dispute in Land Reply filed on 10.4.03 Case under Act and Rules
20. CWP No. 48/03 Baldev Sharma Vs. State Composition of offence Reply filed on 13.2.2004 Case under Act and Rules
21. CWP No. 543/03 Trisha Sharma Vs. State of H.P. Regarding installation of Dumper for garbage within M.C. Limits. Informed A.G. vide letter dated 6-2-2009. Reply is to be filed by the D.C. Shimla Case under Act and Rules
22. CWP 956/03 Smt. Trisha Sharma V/s State Heritage Zone case Personal Compliance affidavit regarding fixing of plaques on the heritage buildings stands filed . Case under Act and Rules
23. CWP 1056/03 Sh. Amar Jeet Singh V/s State Retention Policy Reply filed on 12.2.04. Case under Act and Rules
24. C.S. 5/03 Sh. Surat Ram V/s State Dispute in Land Reply filed on 10.4.03 Case under Act and Rules
25. CWP No. 48/03 Baldev Sharma Vs. State Composition of offence Reply filed on 13.2.2004 Case under Act and Rules
26. CWP 511/04 Smt. Uma Devi Vs. State of H.P. Regarding Planning Permission case. Reply filed on 16..6.2006 Case under Act and Rules
27. CWP 359/05 Sh. Vinod Gandhotra V/s State Reg. Planning Permission Reply filed on 13.6.05 Case under Act and Rules
28. RFA 235/05 and 243/05 Nirmal Singh V/s Tibetian Children Misc. Informed A.G. vide letter dated 16-10-2005. Case under Act and Rules
29.. CWPPIL 7/2005 K.K. Gupta Vs. State of H.P. Regarding action on unauthorized construction Reply filed on 21.11.2005 Case under Act and Rules
30. C.R. No. 65/05 and 98/05 Tek Chand Vs. State Dispute of use of water in Rajhana SADA Shoghi The Hon’ble Court vide order dated 6-10-2005 remanded back the case to the executing court for further processing in accordance with law. Case under Act and Rules
31. CWP 359/05 Sh. Vinod Gandhotra V/s State Reg. Planning Permission Reply filed on 13.6.05 Case under Act and Rules
32. RFA 235/05 and 243/05 Nirmal Singh V/s Tibetian Children Misc. Informed A.G. vide letter dated 16-10-2005. Case under Act and Rules
33. CWP No. 1370/05 Sheela Malhotra Regarding Planning Permission case Informed that Sur-rejoinder to be filed vide letter dated 29.1.2008. Case under Act and Rules
34. CWP No. 1357/05 Sohan Singh Regarding Planning Permission case Reply filed on 1.3.2006 Case under Act and Rules
35. CWP 690/06 Pankaj Goal Vs. State Construction of commercial building at Taradevi Reply filed on 28.9.2006 Case under Act and Rules
36. CWP 324/06 Brahma Nand V/s State Regarding Planning Permission case Reply filed on 21.6.2006 Case under Act and Rules
37. CWP 302/06 R.S. Thakur Reg. Encroachment Reply filed on 17.5.2006 Case under Act and Rules
38. C.W.P. No. 654/06 Surekha V/s State Regarding construction in Mauza Bagog of M.C. Area Shimla Informed A.G. Vide letter dated 4-6-2008 that case pertains to M.C., Shimla. Case under Act and Rules
39. CWP 1278/06 The Baddi-Barotiwala and Nalagarh Reg. Dev. Plan of Baddi Comments stands sent to Secy (TCP) vide letter dated 3.1.2007 reply to be filed by Secy (Revenue) Case under Act and Rules
40. CWP No. 300/06 Neelam Sharma Vs. State Regarding encroachment on the Mall road & Lower Bazar Shimla Reply filed on 22.82009 Case under Act and Rules
41. CWP No. 1191/07 Virender Kumar Vs. State The case pertains to SADA Kinnaur The case pertains to SADA Kunnaur. The department is not party in this case. Case under Act and Rules
42. R.S.A. No. 452/07 Surekha Vs. Sudama Ram Planning Permission case of Barog falls in M.C. Shimla entire record to the case has been gutted In fire on 28.6.1993. Intimated AG vide letter dated 26-7-08 to adopt reply of MC Case under Act and Rules
43. C.W.P. No. 2289/07 Brijender Singh Parmar V/s State of H.P. Regarding Unauthorized Construction in Mandi Town Intimated E.O.Mandi vide letter dated 13-1-2010 Case under Act and Rules
44. O.A. No. 679/07 Sunil Kapoor V/s State She retained Govt. accommodation for which PWD imposed penal rent of Rs. 1,63,573/- Reply filed on 20-2-2008 To allot Govt. accommodation.
45. CWP 1006/08 Surinder Singh Construction of Bright land hotel, Shimla. Reply filed on 30.8.2008 Case under Act and Rules
46. CWP 1558/08 Bhopal Singh C/o unauthorized construction in Dhalpur Kullu Reply stand filed in the month of September 2008. Case under Act and Rules
47. CMPMO No. 611/2008 Indu Khanna V/s State Impugned order dated 29-9-2008 passed by the ld. District Judge, Solan in CMA No. 3-s/14 of 2008 be stayed Intimated A.G. on 11-5-2010 to adopt the reply of SADA Kandaghat. Case under Act and Rules
48. RSA 154/08 Hira Lal Vs. Ram Krishan Hira Lal Vs. Ram Krishan Intimated AG vide letter dated 16.7.2008& 6.1.2009 Case under Act and Rules
49. CWP No. 6354/ 2008 Gulshan Kumar Vs State Service matter   R&P Rules
50. CWP No. 3447/09 Bishan Dass V/S State Regarding construction of House in Shangti Shimla and taking action against the defaulters who have raised construction in violation of TCP norms. Reply filed by Chairman, SADA as case pertains to SADA, Ghanahatti intimated ACS(TCP)vide letter dated 22.2.2010 Case under Act and Rules
51. CWP NO.1957/09 Parma Nand Klanta V/s state of H.P. and others. Aseem Trader Bye pass road Panthaghati be restrained from running shop as the site in question falls in residential landuse as per IDP Shimla. The area falls in M.C. limits. Intimated A.G. vide letter dated 29.08.2009 that area falls under the jurisdiction of M.C., Shimla. Case under Act and Rules
52. CWPIL No. 47/09 Court on its own motion Construction of cottage in Cemetery, Shimla Case pertains to M.C., Shimla. Intimated vide letter dated 14.01.2010 Case under Act and Rules
53. CWP 225/09 Gulaba Ram Reg. c/o Hanuman Mandir Complex in Jakhu Shimla Intimated AG vide letter dated 28.2.2009. Case under Act and Rules
54. CWP No. 7784/2010 Samidha Society V/s State of H.P. To categorize the State of H.P. into industrial, Commercial, Residential or silence area/zones for the purpose of implementation of noise standard for different areas under environment act. Reply filed in the Hon’ble High Court. Case under Act and Rules
55. CMPMO No. 247/2010 Tek Chand V/s Jai Nand and others. To set aside the order dated 28-5-2010 and 19-6-2010 passed by the ld. Civil Judge Court No. 7. Informed A.G. vide letter dated 26.8.2010. Case under Act and Rules
56. CWP No. 4849/10 Gulshan Kumar (Driver) To quash the termination order of Sh. Gulshan Kumar Reply filed on 4-1-2011 Regarding termination from service as driver.
57. CWPIL No. 15/2010 Court of its own motion vi/s state. Regarding norms of kullu valley planning area. Affidavit filed on 18.11.2011 Case under Act and rule.
58. CWP No. 2194/2010 Rajinder Paul V/s State Reply filed on 20-8-2010 Regarding regularization as chainman. R&P Rules
59. COPC No. 677/2010 Montrex Resort Ltd. Vs. Ascot Hotel Regarding Unauthorized Construction at Kasauli ________ Case under Act and Rules
60. CWP No.___ M/s Himland Real Estate V/s state Permission for residential Colony at Baddi. Intimated to AG. Case under Apartment Act.
61. CWP No. 894/11 Hem Chand Thakur V/s State Regarding Disconnection Of water and electricity connection at mauza Parech Kufridhar Intimated A.G. vide letter dated 4-6-11 Case under Act and Rule
62. CWP No. 4595/11 Rajeev Verma V/s State Regarding Quashing of notificatrion dated 28-2-2011 Intimated AG Case under Act and Rules.
63. CWP No. 6928/11 Naresh Kumar V/s State Regarding regularization as Chainman in Divisional Office Hamirpur Reply filed on 13.1.2012 Service matter
64. CWP NO. 7518/2011 Bhupinder Sud V/s state. Construction of building in Bharari simla. Informed A.G . vide letter dated 10.10. 2011. Case under Act and Rule..
65. CWP 7273/2011 Rajinder Chauhan V/s state Regarding Cemetery at Sanjauli under Heritage zone. Informed AG vide office letter dt 2.11. 2011. Case under Act and Rule..
66. CWP No 9222/ 2011 Jeet Ram V/s state Construction of building At Parech. Informed A.G vide letter dated 18-2-12 Case under Act and rule.
67. CMPMO No. 432/ 11 Shashi Kala V/s Pratap Chand Regarding construction in Rohru Town Reply not Required at this stage Case under Act and Rule
68. CWP No 11636/ 2011 Purujit Singh V/s State Regarding construction of Tourism village in Baldeyan. Supplementary affidavit filed on 1.3.2013 by Additional Chief Secretary (TCP) Case under Act and Rule
69. CWP No. 10426/ 2011 Jagdish Ram V/s State To take action against the Respondent No. 5 for Raising unauthorized Construction in Kullu Reply filed on 5.3.2012 Case under Act and
70. CWP No 6981/11 Kehar Singh V/s State Regarding construction of house in Sangti---Issue of NOC thereof Intimated A.G. Vide letter dated 17-9- 2011 Case under Act and Rules
71. CWP No. 1079/2011 Meenakshi Rana V/s state Regarding notice of unauthorized construction in Paonta sahib and disconnection of electricity connection by the HPSEB . Reply filed on 27..4.2011 Case under Act and Rule
72. CWP No 168/2012 Puneet Kumar V/s State Regarding appointment on Compassionate ground to the S/o Prakash Chand Driver Reply filed on 18.8.2012. Service Matter
73. CWP No. 3952/ 2012 Bansi Lal Vs. State of H.P.     Case under Act and Rule
74. CWP No. 1349/ 2012 Rani Seth Vs State of H.P.     Case under Act and Rule
75. CWP No. 7747/2012 Vardhman Textiles Case regarding Com[ounding u/s 39 (c) Reply filed Case under Act and Rule
76. CWP No. 776/12 M/s Vardhman Yarn Textiles Case regarding Com[ounding u/s 39 (c) Reply filed Case under Act and Rule
77. RSA No. 26/2012 Balak Ram Vs Amrik Singh Indus Hospital Reply filed Case under Act and Rule
78. CWP No. 10106/ 2012 Jagdish Chand Vs State Unauthorized Construction Reply filed Case under Act and Rule
79. LPA No. 106/2012 Vimal Sharma Vs State of H.P. Unauthorized Construction Kullu ------ Case under Act and Rule
80. CWP No. 8339/ 2013 Sarbjeet Singh Vs State of H.P. Case pertains to E.O Chamba -------- Case under Act and Rule
81. CWP No. 330/13 M.K. Malhotra V/s State Case regarding recover of Amount Reply filed Service matter
82. CWP No. 9327/ 2013 Madhu Verma Vs. State of H.P. Unauthorized Construction -------- Case under Act and Rule
83. CWP No. 7603/2013 Jagdish Chand Vs State Case regarding unauthorized construction Reply filed Case under Act And Rule
84. CWP No. 4637/14 Smt.Pritma Malhotra Vs State Planning Permission Case Reply filed Case under Act And Rule
85. COPC No. Vijay Gupta V/s State Planning Permission ------- Case Under Act and Rules
86. CWP No. 4450/14 Joginder Singh V/s State Case pertains to M.C Dalhousie ------ Case under Act and Rule
87. CWP No. 8246/14 Rajeev Bansal V/s State Planning Permission Reply filed Case under Act and Rule
88. CWP No. 1961/2014 Hem Nandani V/s State Case pertains to E.O. Chamba ----- Case under Act and Rule
89. CWP No. 356/14 Yoginder Mohan Sengupta V/s State     National Green Tribunal
90. CWP No. 484/14 Sushma Bisht V/s State Zoning Regulations of Development Plan of Mandi Planning Area Status Report filed National Green Tribunal
91. O.A. 2169/2015 Jasbir Singh V/s State of H.P Service matter Reply filed 7.9.2015 Service matter
92. O.A. 1800/2015 Anjali Sharma V/s State Service matter --------- Regarding Transfer
93. O.A. 2377/2015 Arvind Kumar V/s State of H.P Service matter Reply filed Regarding Backwages.
94. CWP No. 3632/2015 Harish Chaudhary V/s State of H.P Unauthorised construction Reply filed Unauthorised construction
95. CWP No. 3744/2015 Rajinder Chauhan V/s State of H.P Service matter --------- Regarding Transfer